MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2094107369 · doi:10.1142/s0217979203018028

HOW CELLS AVOID ERRORS IN METABOLIC AND SIGNALING NETWORKS

2003· article· en· W2094107369 on OpenAlexaff
Jay E. Mittenthal, Bertrand Clarke, Alexander Scheeline

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Modern Physics B · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGene Regulatory Network Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSigmoid functionProofreadingComputer scienceReliability (semiconductor)Sequence (biology)Metabolic networkArtificial intelligenceBiologyComputational biologyArtificial neural networkGeneticsPhysicsPower (physics)Gene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We examine features of intracellular networks that make errors less probable and beneficial responses more probable. In a false negative (F - ) error, a network does not respond to input. A network is reliable if it operates with a low probability of a F - error. Features that promote reliability include fewer reactions in sequence, more alternative pathways, no side reactions and negative feedback. In a false positive (F + ) error, a network produces output without input. Here, a network is specific if it has a low probability of a F + error. Conjunctions of signals within or between pathways can improve specificity through sigmoid steady-state response curves, kinetic proofreading and checkpoints. Both reliability and specificity are important in networks that regulate the fate of a cell and in networks with hubs or modules, and this includes scale-free networks. Some networks discriminate among several inputs by responding to each input through a different combination of pathways.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.323
Threshold uncertainty score0.431

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Modern Physics BSame topicGene Regulatory Network AnalysisFrench-language works237,207