MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2094116541 · doi:10.1134/s0030400x08020197

Higher harmonic generation in laser plasma upon interaction of femtosecond laser pulses with doubly and singly charged ions under conditions of resonance frequency conversion of laser radiation

2008· article· en· W2094116541 on OpenAlexaff
R. A. Ganeev, L. B. Elouga Bom, T. Ozaki

Bibliographic record

VenueOptics and Spectroscopy · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLaser-Matter Interactions and Applications
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLaserHarmonicsPlasmaFemtosecondIonAtomic physicsHigh harmonic generationMaterials scienceExcited stateSpectroscopyResonance (particle physics)PhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The higher harmonic generation (HHG) in plasmas formed on the surface of different solid targets (Pb, Ag, Ge, In, Au, Cr, Pt, V, Mn, Ga, Bi, Sb, Cu, Al, Ca, and Sn) by laser ablation is studied. The possibility of HHG upon interaction of femtosecond radiation with doubly charged ions is studied on the example of Mn plasma. This process allowed generation of higher harmonics of up to the 101st order. The results of investigation of individual enhanced harmonics in Sn, Sb, In, and Cr plasmas are presented. Comparison of the conditions of HHG in weakly and strongly excited plasmas showed that the latter is preferable for efficient frequency conversion. It is demonstrated that the use of laser plasma spectroscopy with high time resolution allows one to determine the optimal conditions for generation of harmonics with a plateaulike distribution in the far-UV spectral region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOptics and SpectroscopySame topicLaser-Matter Interactions and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207