Approximation Algorithms for the Supplier's Supply Chain Scheduling Problem to Minimize Delivery and Inventory Holding Costs
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We study the upstream supplier's batch scheduling problem in a supply chain, which was defined by Hall and Potts [Hall, N. G., C. N. Potts. 2003. Supply chain scheduling: Batching and delivery. Oper. Res. 51(4) 566–584]. The supplier has to manufacture multiple products and deliver them to customers in batches. There is an associated delivery cost with each batch. The objective of the supplier is to minimize the total inventory holding and delivery costs. We present simple approximation algorithms for this strongly NP-hard problem, which find a solution that is guaranteed to have a cost at most 3/2 times the minimum. We also prove that the approximation algorithms have worst-case bounds that vary parametrically with the data and that for realistic parameter values are much better than 3/2. The theoretical results are also supported by the findings of a computational study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it