MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2094143940 · doi:10.5556/j.tkjm.43.2012.849

$(\theta,\phi)$-derivations as homomorphisms or as anti-homomorphisms on a near ring

2012· article· en· W2094143940 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTamkang Journal of Mathematics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Topics in Algebra
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHomomorphismMathematicsSemigroupPrime (order theory)Ideal (ethics)SemiprimeRing (chemistry)Prime idealContext (archaeology)CombinatoricsSemiprime ringDiscrete mathematicsPure mathematicsAlgebra over a field

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let $N$ be a near ring. An additive mapping $d:N\longrightarrow N$ is said to be a $(\theta,\phi)$-derivation on $N$ if there exist mappings $\theta,\phi:N\longrightarrow N$ such that$d(xy)=\theta(x)d(y)+d(x)\phi(y)$ holds for all $x,y \in N$. In the context of 3-prime and 3-semiprime nearrings, we show that for suitably-restricted $\theta$ and $\phi$, there exist no nonzero $(\theta,\phi)$-derivations which act as a homomorphism or an anti-homomorphism on $N$ or a nonzero semigroup ideal of $N$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.229
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it