Interaction of Neuronal Cdc2-like Protein Kinase with Microtubule-associated Protein Tau
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Neuronal Cdc2-like protein kinase (NCLK), a approximately 58-kDa heterodimer, was isolated from neuronal microtubules (Ishiguro, K., Takamatsu, M., Tomizawa, K., Omori, A., Takahashi, M., Arioka, M., Uchida, T. and Imahori, K. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 10897-10901). The biochemical nature of NCLK-microtubule association is not known. In this study we found that NCLK is released from microtubules upon microtubule disassembly as a 450-kDa species. The 450-kDa species is an NCLK.tau complex, and NCLK-bound tau is in a nonphosphorylated state. Tau phosphorylation causes NCLK.tau complex dissociation, and phosphorylated tau does not bind to NCLK. In vitro, the Cdk5 subunit of NCLK binds to the microtubule-binding region of tau and NCLK associates with microtubules only in the presence of tau. Our data indicate that in brain extract NCLK is complexed with tau in a tau phosphorylation-dependent manner and that tau anchors NCLK to microtubules. Recently NCLK has been suggested to be aberrantly activated and to hyperphosphorylate tau in Alzheimer's disease brain (Patrick, G. N., Zukerberg, L., Nikolic, M., de la Monte, S., Dikkes, P, and Tsai, L.-H. (1999) Nature 402, 615-622). Our findings may explain why in Alzheimer's disease NCLK specifically hyperphosphorylates tau, although this kinase has a number of protein substrates in the brain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".