MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2094168399 · doi:10.2138/am.2005.1794

Absolute quantification by powder X-ray diffraction of complex mixtures of crystalline and amorphous phases for applications in the Earth sciences

2005· article· en· W2094168399 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Mineralogist · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicX-ray Diffraction in Crystallography
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmorphous solidPowder diffractionDiffractionMaterials scienceAnalytical Chemistry (journal)X-ray crystallographyAuthigenicCompton scatteringScatteringMineralogyChemistryCrystallographyPhysicsOpticsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many natural surface-environment samples, such as soils and marine and lacustrine sediments, are complex mixtures involving several mineral phases (both petrogenic and authigenic), several amorphous and nanoparticulate inorganic phases (usually authigenic or pedogenic), and a heterogeneous amorphous component of “organic matter” (OM). The main inorganic amorphous and crystalline components are often operationally separated and quantified by various selective or sequential chemical extraction methods that are subject to various artifacts and that can be significantly affected by the presence of OM. Here we develop a general method of absolute quantification based on powder X-ray diffraction (pXRD) measurements that are obtained using standard θ-θ or θ-2θ type diffractometers. The method does not require calibration or the use of standards and does not require instrument parameter determinations but relies instead on exact normalization conditions that we prove. In particular, we develop a .general integrated intensity formula. (GIIF) for X-ray diffraction. All relevant sampleradiation interaction phenomena are considered, including polarization, mass absorption, Compton scattering, and resonance absorption re-emission. We show that the mole fraction of any given phase (crystalline, amorphous, quasicrystalline, or nanophase) is exactly given by the collection sphere integrated intensity of the resolved phase-specific contribution to the Compton corrected and electron unit normalized diffraction pattern, T(θ), divided by the wavevector (q) integrated average squared atomic form factor of the phase. Electron unit calibration is achieved by a global normalization that directly gives the product A⊥Io of the effective cross sectional area (A⊥) of the incident (and outgoing) beam and the effective incident beam intensity (Io), including counter efficiency, beam path losses, etc. The problem of incomplete collection sphere integration (including the q = 0 region) is resolved by showing that all the results hold for a given Bragg angle range of measurement for a sufficiently large range. We evaluate the accuracy of the method by application to synthetic binary amorphous-crystalline mixtures of (1) a rock standard, that provides an assembly of crystalline phases, (2) a certified OM standard, and (3) a synthetic inorganic amorphous phase (silica gel). We expect that the method will be particularly useful in surface sediment and environmental geochemistry applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.882
Threshold uncertainty score0.702

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it