Saccharide imprinting of poly(aniline boronic acid) in the presence of fluoride
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A new approach for the electrosynthesis of saccharide-imprinted poly(aniline boronic acid) is described. The method involves the formation of a saccharide-aminophenylboronic acid complex in the presence of fluoride to allow the electropolymerization of a self-doped, molecularly imprinted polyaniline. The formation of the anionic monomer complex enables electrochemical polymerization at near neutral pH (5-7) ensuring the incorporation of saccharide in the resulting, self-doped polymer. In this work, films were imprinted with D-fructose where saccharide-aminophenylboronic acid complexation occurred in the presence of one equivalent of fluoride. The selectivity toward D-fructose relative to D-glucose showed an increase of over 25% as a result of imprinting. In addition to the enhanced selectivity, to the best of our knowledge this is the first example of the electropolymerization of a self-doped polyaniline homopolymer under neutral pH conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".