Fin size and associated fanning behaviour as indicators of reproductive status in male round gobies (Neogobius melanostomus)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Determination of male reproductive status in the round goby ( Neogobius melanostomus ) can be challenging because current metrics do not always reflect steroid production. In many fishes, fin size changes during the reproductive season; therefore, fins may provide additional information about reproductive status. In some species, fin size correlates with fanning behaviour; a trait common in fish species that exhibit male parental care as it is important for egg maintenance. Because male fanning begins before spawning, fanning also may play a role in pheromone dispersal and courtship, potential indicators of reproductive status. Initially, we examined which morphological metrics (head width, total length, condition, fin size) best delineated groups of reproductive and non-reproductive male gobies (determined using the gonadosomatic index, GSI). Surface areas of fused pelvic fins and caudal fins best separated these groups of males. Using video recordings of nest-guarding male gobies, we characterised both pectoral and caudal fanning behaviour. Rates of maximum caudal fanning (fin beats per minute) were higher than rates of pectoral fanning; however, caudal fanning overall was less frequent than pectoral fanning. Subsequently, we determined if fanning metrics were related to 11-ketotestosterone (11-KT), GSI and morphological traits. No relationship was found between any of the fanning or morphological metrics and GSI values or 11-KT. However, there was a significant relationship between the maximum pectoral fanning rate and condition factor of males. These findings suggest that relative fin size, but not fanning behaviours, may be useful metrics to measure reproductive status.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it