MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2094214128 · doi:10.1074/jbc.m100208200

Cooperative Activation by GATA-4 and YY1 of the Cardiac B-type Natriuretic Peptide Promoter

2001· article· en· W2094214128 on OpenAlexaff
Suparna Bhalla, Lynda Robitaille, Mona Nemer

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biological Chemistry · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSignaling Pathways in Disease
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversité de MontréalMontreal Clinical Research Institute
FundersU.S. Public Health Service
KeywordsNatriuretic peptideYY1NPR1NPR2PeptideInternal medicineChemistryPromoterEndocrinologyMedicineGeneBiochemistryHeart failureGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

YY1, a multifunctional protein essential for embryonic development, is a known repressor or activator of transcription. In cardiac and skeletal myocytes, YY1 has been described essentially as a negative regulator of muscle-specific genes. In this study, we report that YY1 is a transcriptional activator of the B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) gene, which encodes one of the heart major secretory products. YY1 binds an element within the proximal cardiac BNP promoter, in close proximity to the high affinity binding sites for the zinc finger GATA proteins. We show that YY1 cooperates with GATA-4 to synergistically activate BNP transcription. Structure-function analysis revealed that the DNA binding domain of YY1 is sufficient for cooperative interaction with GATA-4, likely through corecruitment of the CREB-binding protein coactivator. The results suggest that YY1 and GATA factors are components of transcriptionally active complexes present in cardiac and other GATA-containing cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations79
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biological ChemistrySame topicSignaling Pathways in DiseaseFrench-language works237,207