Context-Aware Generic Service Discovery and Service Composition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Service Composition is to create a new business process by composing several services in order to fulfill business goals that individual services cannot achieve. Service discovery and service composition can be highly adaptive to contexts, i.e., according to context information, e.g., location, budget and time, we can discover and compose these services to satisfy particular requirements in the contexts. Moreover, we want to contain non-electronic services, e.g., restaurants, into service composition. These services are not considered in existing service composition research, but are ubiquitous in mobile phone working environment. In this paper, we present the methods of discovering and composing non-electronic services based on contexts. We build a constraint-based context model which is more suitable for service composition algorithm than the other context model. Our service composition algorithm uses soft constraints. With this feature, the service composition algorithm can give the user several "good enough" solutions, instead of null solution. More importantly, we include non-electronic services into service composition. Throughout the paper, an entertainment planner is used as a motivated example.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".