MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2094247368 · doi:10.1243/0954407011528176

Sensitivity of rearward amplication control of a truck/full trailer to tyre cornering stiffness variations

2001· article· en· W2094247368 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part D Journal of Automobile Engineering · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle Dynamics and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsYawControl theory (sociology)TrailerController (irrigation)AxleTruckSensitivity (control systems)Automotive engineeringAutomobile handlingEngineeringTorqueVehicle dynamicsAccelerationArticulated vehicleStiffnessComputer scienceControl (management)Structural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Highway safety and vehicle performance are two important considerations in the design of a heavy vehicle combination. In this paper a performance measure called the ‘rearward amplification ratio’ (RWA) is used as a control criterion in the design of a vehicle-handling controller. This approach is different to conventional control techniques. The RWA is defined as the ratio of the peak lateral acceleration at the rearmost trailer's centre of gravity (CG) to that of the lead unit during a lane-change manoeuvre. The vehicle under consideration is a six-axle truck/full trailer, which usually exhibits a high level of RWA leading to roll-over during obstacle avoidance manoeuvres. In this study, several control strategies are examined, namely active yaw control at the truck CG, active yaw control at the dolly CG and active yaw control at the trailer CG. These could be employed individually or in combination. The effect of an active control torque applied to various vehicle units is examined by using an optimal linear quadratic regulator approach combined with a simplified four degrees-of-freedom linear vehicle model. The controller performance index parameters are determined for the vehicle based on acceptable RWA target values. The sensitivity of the controller to tyre cornering stiffness variation is further evaluated. Simulation results indicate that the RWA can be reduced without significant change of the uncontrolled vehicle trajectory when active yaw torque is applied to the dolly. The controller can be more effective in improving the dynamic performance and roll stability of this type of commercial vehicle, if applied to the lead unit (truck) or to the last unit (trailer). However, the path of the vehicle will be strongly influenced and driving difficulties can be experienced. For active yaw control at the dolly CG, the optimal controller is found to be most sensitive to the dolly's tyres' cornering stiffness variations and least sensitive to steering axle from the RWA point of view. It is also found that the controller is most sensitive to steering axle parameter variations for path following.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.397
Threshold uncertainty score0.765

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it