Preservation of lower incidence of chronic lymphocytic leukemia in Chinese residents in British Columbia: a 26-year survey from 1983 to 2008
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The incidence of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in the Asian population is up to 10 times lower than that in Caucasians. Studies on CLL in Asian residents in North America may help to determine the relative genetic and environmental causes of such a difference. Computerized records of CLL incidence from the combined British Columbia (BC) databases (n = 2736) and the Hong Kong Cancer Registry (HKCR, n = 572) were traced. Ethnic Chinese cases of CLL in BC were identified (n = 35). The world age standardized rates (WASRs) of CLL (per 100 000) were calculated in BC (1.71), HK (0.28) and BC Chinese (0.4), respectively. Using standard incidence ratios (SIRs), the observed BC Chinese case number was comparable to the figure projected from HK rates (SIR 1.3, p = 0.1) but significantly lower than the figure following BC rates (SIR 0.22, p < 0.0001). The difference was maintained over both genders, in all age groups and through the years. Our data over three decades suggest that genetic factors outplay environmental factors to give lower CLL rates in Chinese.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".