MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2094276674 · doi:10.4000/dossiersgrihl.4983

L’âme, prison du corps ? À propos d’un détail du Theophilus in carcere

2011· article· fr· W2094276674 on OpenAlexaff
Éric Méchoulan

Bibliographic record

VenueLes dossiers du Grihl · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPrisonArtPhilosophyPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En reprenant la suggestion de Michel Foucault sur « l’âme, prison du corps » qui renverse la conception classique, on peut analyser un détail du Theophilus in carcere de Théophile de Viau (la référence surprenante à Danaé, vue plutôt comme sexuellement douteuse, alors qu’il est accusé de mauvais usage du sexe) comme exemplaire de cette production d’âme dans un écrit de prison, permettant ainsi de capturer/captiver ses juges. L’âme naît alors des procédures de surveillance et de capture qui cherchent à en déchiffrer les figures, changeant le corps en archive de soi.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.314
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLes dossiers du GrihlSame topicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchFrench-language works237,207