MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2094285241 · doi:10.3138/cras-s031-03-03

Avoiding Pyrrhic Victories: On Technology

2001· article· en· W2094285241 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Gregory J.S. Fowler

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Review of American Studies · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedia, Religion, Digital Communication
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdiotDemiseComplaintMedia studiesAuthoritarianismProduct (mathematics)EntertainmentSociologyHistoryPsychologyAestheticsPolitical scienceLawArtLiteraturePolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Advanced technology without advanced thought creates not advancement, but demise. When a society becomes a product of its own technology it destroys itself. Neale Donald Walsch Rather than following a broadcast-model world for entertainment, and a broadcast-model world for learning, and a broadcast, talk-down, authoritarian world in the family and in the workplace, these kids are going to have a much more open, interactive, collaborative, verbal, thoughtful environment, and that will change the way they will be as adults. These kids will dominate the 21st century. Don Tapscott Cutting Through the ConstructsOne of my Boomer friends recently voiced frustration with social influences upon his ability to raise his child. My friend’s complaint was with the weathering away of his absolute authority as a parent. “It seems that I have very little ability to teach my child my values!” he exclaimed as we were eating dinner one evening. “If I tell my child something about the way I see the world she simply gets online and talks to someone who sees the world differently and I end up seeming like the bad guy or the idiot!”

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.907
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Review of American StudiesSame topicMedia, Religion, Digital CommunicationFrench-language works237,207