Thermogenic and vocalization responses to cold in the chicken hatchling during normoxia and hypoxia.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We investigated the vocalization and the thermogenic responses to cold during hypoxia in chicken hatchlings during the first postnatal day. Calls were quantified in number and sound characteristics (amplitude and frequency); the change in oxygen (O2) consumption, measured by an open-flow methodology, represented thermogenesis. The cold challenge consisted of a decrease in ambient temperature (Ta) from ~39 to 28 °C, in steps of 2 °C, or an acute exposure to ~28 °C, either in normoxia or hypoxia (10% O2). Hypoxia lowered thermogenesis and the critical Ta, suggesting a decrease in the set point for thermoregulation. The vocalization response to cold was rapid; did not progress with the duration or intensity of the cold stimulus; was similar in very young (<8 hr old) and older (12-24 hr) hatchlings despite their differences in thermogenic capacity; and was essentially unaffected by hypoxia. We conclude that the hatchling's vocalization in the cold follows a stereotyped pattern not related to the thermogenic regulation of body temperature. The dissociation between vocalization and thermogenesis might carry some advantage in conditions of cold and hypoxia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".