Intraplantar injection of glutamate evokes peripheral adenosine release in the rat hind paw: involvement of peripheral ionotropic glutamate receptors and capsaicin‐sensitive sensory afferents
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Glutamate receptors have been identified on the peripheral terminals of both primary sensory afferents and sympathetic post-ganglionic neurons, and activation of these receptors produces peripheral sensitization and enhances nociception. Adenosine is an endogenous agent that has a regulatory effect on pain. In brain and spinal cord, adenosine release can be promoted by excitatory amino acids. In the present study, we used in vivo microdialysis to determine whether glutamate also can release adenosine in peripheral tissues. Rats were anesthetized with pentobarbital and microdialysis probes were implanted into the subcutaneous tissue of the plantar aspect of the rat hind paw. Subcutaneous injection of glutamate (50 microL, 0.3-100 micromol) evoked a short-lasting adenosine release immediately following drug injection. Co-administration of either the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, dizocipine maleate (MK-801, 1 nmol) or the non-NMDA receptor antagonist, 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline (CNQX, 10 nmol) with glutamate blocked such release, suggesting an involvement of peripheral ionotropic glutamate receptors in this response. Systemic pre-treatment with capsaicin, a neurotoxin selective for unmyelinated sensory afferents, significantly reduced glutamate-evoked peripheral adenosine release, but release was not affected by systemic pre-treatment with 6-hydroxydopamine, a neurotoxin selective for sympathetic nerve efferents. Neither MK-801 nor CNQX blocked 5% formalin-evoked adenosine release, suggesting adenosine release by formalin is not secondary to ionotropic glutamate receptor activation. We conclude that administration of glutamate evokes peripheral adenosine release, and that peripheral ionotropic glutamate receptors on unmyelinated sensory afferents are involved in such release. The released adenosine may provide a negative feedback control on nociception.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".