MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2094343542 · doi:10.1016/j.adnc.2004.12.005

QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS OF BARRIERS TO BREASTFEEDING IN VERY-LOW-BIRTHWEIGHT INFANTS IN THE HOSPITAL AND POSTDISCHARGE

2005· article· en· W2094343542 on OpenAlex
Jennifer Callen, Janet Pinelli, Stephanie A. Atkinson, Saroj Saigal

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Neonatal Care · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBreastfeeding Practices and Influences
Canadian institutionsMcMaster Children's HospitalMcMaster University Medical Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBreastfeedingMEDLINEFamily medicineObstetricsPediatrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To determine barriers to the successful establishment and maintenance of breastfeeding in very-low-birthweight (VLBW) infants, both in the hospital and after discharge, and changes in barriers over time. SUBJECTS: Sixty-four mothers of infants <1500 g birth weight who planned to breastfeed and were in the supplementary structured breastfeeding counseling intervention group. DESIGN: This qualitative, longitudinal study is a secondary analysis of a previously reported randomized controlled trial of a breastfeeding support intervention that examined infants weighing <1500 g at birth. METHODS: A qualitative technique, content analysis, was used to review, analyze, interpret, and categorize data for the current study. Data were extracted from the research records of the research lactation consultant that addressed all aspects of mothers' reported breastfeeding experiences. The principal investigator identified the main issues of the conversations, entered these into a summary chart, and then assigned appropriate categories. All categories are a reflection of maternal perception. Categorical data were analyzed descriptively using the crosstabs function. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Barriers to the successful establishment and maintenance of breastfeeding during discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), at discharge home, and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months corrected age, or until weaning from breastfeeding. Changes in breastfeeding barriers across the 6 time periods were also determined. PRINCIPAL RESULTS: At NICU discharge, low milk volume was the greatest breastfeeding barrier. During the period from discharge home and at 1 month and 3 months, the infants' compromised physical status was the largest barrier to breastfeeding. Data from the 6- and 12-month time periods indicated that the provision of complementary feeding was the greatest barrier to breastfeeding; it was most prevalent in the period following NICU discharge and before discharge home. Across all time periods, nipple and breast problems were most prevalent at NICU discharge, whereas poor technique was a barrier at 1 month. Mothers' compromised emotional status was greatest at discharge from the NICU and diminished thereafter. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this study indicate the need to address time-period-specific barriers encountered during the breastfeeding experience of mothers of VLBW infants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.242
Threshold uncertainty score0.453

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it