MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2094347752 · doi:10.7202/041502ar

Quelques rapports entre le théâtre et le cirque au Québec

2010· article· fr· W2094347752 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Julie Boudreault

Bibliographic record

VenueL’Annuaire théâtral Revue québécoise d’études théâtrales · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Research Institute for the Advancement of Women
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCirqueHumanitiesArtGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

À l’heure actuelle, la formule théâtre-cirque fait les beaux jours des nouveaux cirques. Au Québec cette formule n’est pourtant pas si nouvelle puisque les premiers cirques venus au Bas-Canada mêlaient déjà les deux genres. Bien entendu, les spectacles des cirques d’aujourd’hui sont loin d’être identiques à ceux d’autrefois, mais force nous est d’admettre que le métissage a subsisté. Rappelant l’histoire, cet article fait quelques rapprochements entre le théâtre et le cirque au Québec. Il révèle également que l’un et l’autre ont des orientations communes plus que jamais.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.418

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0140.006
Scholarly communication0.0050.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueL’Annuaire théâtral Revue québécoise d’études théâtralesSame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207