Dominant species identity regulates invasibility of old‐field plant communities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dominant species are known to exert strong influence over community dynamics, although little work has addressed how they affect invasibility. In this study, we examined whether dominant species identity and abundance affected invasibility of old‐field plant communities. To quantify invasibility, we added seeds of 19 plant species into plots dominated by one of four different herbaceous perennial species ( Andropogon virginicus , Bromus inermis , Centaurea maculosa , or Solidago canadensis ) . We found that, independent of species richness and abiotic variables, plots dominated by Andropogon were the least invasible, while Bromus and Centaurea plots had the highest invasibility. We examined several potential mechanisms by which these dominant species might influence invasibility, and found invasion to increase with decreasing litter biomass and increasing community species richness. The abundance of the dominant species was not a significant predictor of invasion. These results indicate that dominant species identity plays an important role in determining invasibility of plant communities, though exact mechanisms underlying these effects still need to be explored.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".