MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2094398527 · doi:10.1106/eg03-tpbl-e642-n6nq

Using Polymer Characterization Techniques to Predict LDPE Resin Suitability for Extruded Foam Applications

2001· article· en· W2094398527 on OpenAlexaff
J. P. Auger, Lan Phuong Le Nguyen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cellular Plastics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPetroleum Processing and Analysis
Canadian institutionsNova Chemicals (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLow-density polyethyleneMaterials scienceAutoclaveExtrusionComposite materialPolymerCharacterization (materials science)RheologyNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

All LDPE resins are not created equal. It is well known that autoclave LDPEs are considered to be the products of choice for extrusion coating applications. On the other hand, LDPE resins produced using tubular reactors have a different structure that makes them more suitable for extruded foam applications. More specifically, within the choices of tubular LDPE resins for extruded foam applications, some are easier to process and produce better quality foam products than others. What makes one resin better than another? This paper discusses the general chemical and rheological differences between autoclave and tubular LDPE resins then focuses in more detail on those differences for a variety of tubular LDPE products used in the extruded foam market.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.609
Threshold uncertainty score0.485

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cellular PlasticsSame topicPetroleum Processing and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207