MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2094431681 · doi:10.1353/lan.2003.0224

<b>Pedagogical norms for second and foreign language learning and teaching</b> . Ed. by Susan Gass, Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig, Sally Sieloff Magnan, and Joel Walz. (Language learning and language teaching.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2002. Pp. 305. ISBN 1588112624. $32.95.

2003· article· en· W2094431681 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueLanguage · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSecond Language Learning and Teaching
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNorm (philosophy)LinguisticsForeign languageSociologyLanguage educationHonorContext (archaeology)PedagogyPsychologyEpistemologyComputer sciencePhilosophyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Pedagogical norms for second and foreign language learning and teaching ed. by Susan Gass et al. María del Pilar García Mayo Pedagogical norms for second and foreign language learning and teaching. Ed. by Susan Gass, Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig, Sally Sieloff Magnan, and Joel Walz. (Language learning and language teaching.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2002. Pp. 305. ISBN 1588112624. $32.95. This book reconsiders the concept of pedagogical norm, in existence since the 1960s, and focuses on its impact on research and pedagogy. In their introduction, Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig and Susan Gass define pedagogical norms as ‘a combination of language systems and forms selected by linguists and pedagogues to serve as the immediate language target, or targets, that learners seek to acquire during their language study’ (3). The volume (in honor of Albert Valdman) is made up of twelve chapters, divided into three sections: Section 1, ‘Defining pedagogical norms’, Section 2, ‘Applying pedagogical norms’, and Section 3, ‘Extending pedagogical norms’. Sally Sieloff Magnan and JoelWalz’s opening chapter, ‘Pedagogical norms: Development of the concept and illustrations from French’, traces the development of the notion of pedagogical norm over four decades while reviewing Albert Valdman’s writings on the topic. In the second chapter, ‘Norms, native speakers, and reversing language shift’, Bernard Spolsky provides a historical context for the concept of norm and emphasizes its vital function in language learning and teaching, but he also argues for the need to consider the existence and special meaning of language diversity. In ‘Standard, norm, and variability in language learning: A view from foreign language research’, Claire Kramsch examines both second and foreign language research and practice and argues for ‘a beneficial cross-fertilization between FL standards and SL norms’ (71). In ‘French immersion in Montréal: Pedagogical norm and functional competence’, Julie Auger explores the notion of pedagogical norm in the context of the teaching of Québec French to Anglophones in immersion programs and provides suggestions for curriculum design. In the second section, ‘Applying pedagogical norms’, Bill VanPatten (‘Communicative classrooms, processing instruction, and pedagogical norms’) and James Lee (‘The initial impact of reading as input for the acquisition of future tense morphology in Spanish’) explore the psycholinguistic dimension of pedagogical norms and propose pedagogical practices based on input processing. Laurie Anne Ramsey (‘Treating French intonation: Observed variation and suggestions for a pedagogical norm’) suggests intonational contours appropriate to present as a pedagogical norm at three different levels of acquisition. In ‘Dislocated subjects in French: A pedagogical norm’, Helene Ossipov shows that dislocated constituents are commonly used in French and argues for the introduction of a pedagogical norm to teach them at beginning and intermediate levels, whereas Betsy J. Kerr (‘Variant word-order constructions: To teach or not to teach? Evidence from learner narratives’) advocates delaying the presentation of those orders until learners have a greater competence in the foreign/second language. The three chapters that make up the last section of the book, Cynthia A. Fox’s ‘Incorporating variation in the French classroom: A pedagogical norm for listening comprehension’, Sarah Jourdain and Mary Ellen Scullen’s ‘A pedagogical norm for circumlocution in French’, and Carl Blyth’s ‘Between orality and literacy: Developing a pedagogical norm for narrative discourse’ extend the notion of pedagogical norm to listening comprehension, communication strategies, and narrative discourse, respectively. The last chapter of the book, ‘Albert Valdman, the compassionate shepherd’, is by Harry L. Gradman. He recalls when he met Professor Valdman, his teacher and dissertation director, and takes the reader through different periods of his mentor’s life. The book concludes with a detailed account of Professor Valdman’s education and publications and with a subject index. [End Page 802] María del Pilar García Mayo Universidad del País Vasco Copyright © 2003 Linguistic Society of America

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.445
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it