MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2094534165 · doi:10.1039/b008594o

Uncertainty in analyte mass for samples containing small numbers of particles

2001· article· en· W2094534165 on OpenAlexaff
Zhi Gao, Byron Kratochvil, M. John M. Duke

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Analyst · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicScientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNankai University
KeywordsAnalyteMonte Carlo methodSampling (signal processing)Standard deviationRelative standard deviationChemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Biological systemChromatographyStatisticsDetection limitMathematicsPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A sampling equation was derived that relates the standard deviation in analyte mass to the number of particles in the sample, the fractions of the different types of particles in the mixture and the masses and analyte concentrations of the individual particles. The equation, which is applicable to samples containing any number of particles, was verified by sampling and analysis of two cereal grain mixtures for manganese, potassium, chlorine and magnesium, and by Monte Carlo computer simulation. Comparison of the sampling precision of analyte mass with the analytical measurement precision was also studied, and it was shown that use of the equation allows the calculation of the minimum number of particles required to hold the sampling relative standard deviation to that of the analytical measurement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.037
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.037
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.430
GPT teacher head0.427
Teacher spread0.002 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe AnalystSame topicScientific Measurement and Uncertainty EvaluationFrench-language works237,207