MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2094538151 · doi:10.1142/s0217732303007965

NEW MINIMUM UNCERTAINTY STATES FOR THERMO FIELD DYNAMICS

2003· article· en· W2094538151 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Physics Letters A · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicModel Reduction and Neural Networks
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaChinese Academy of SciencesUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsPhysicsField (mathematics)Dynamics (music)Space (punctuation)Operator (biology)State (computer science)Relation (database)PolynomialHermite polynomialsState spaceThermal quantum field theoryStatistical physicsVariable (mathematics)Field theory (psychology)Classical mechanicsTheoretical physicsApplied mathematicsMathematical physicsMathematical analysisQuantum mechanicsMathematicsPure mathematicsQuantum gravityAlgorithmComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Takahashi–Umezawa Thermo Field Dynamics theory every operator a acting on real field space is accompanied by its image ã acting on fictitious field space, we propose a new uncertainty relation which embodies the finite temperature effect and derive the corresponding minimum uncertainty state — a new thermolized two-variable Hermite polynomial state.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.884
Threshold uncertainty score0.673

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it