MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2094561988 · doi:10.1142/s1005386711000666

Annihilator-small Right Ideals

2011· article· en· W2094561988 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAlgebra Colloquium · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicRings, Modules, and Algebras
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of NewfoundlandUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnnihilatorIdeal (ethics)MathematicsRadical of an idealRadical of a ringMinimal idealPrimary idealRing (chemistry)Pure mathematicsAssociated primeMaximal idealConnection (principal bundle)Principal ideal ringDiscrete mathematicsCombinatoricsAlgebra over a fieldCommutative ringLawGeometryChemistryCommutative property

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A right ideal A of a ring R is called annihilator-small if A+T=R, T a right ideal, implies that [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] indicates the left annihilator. The sum A r of all such right ideals turns out to be a two-sided ideal that contains the Jacobson radical and the left singular ideal, and is contained in the ideal generated by the total of the ring. The ideal A r is studied, conditions when it is annihilator-small are given, its relationship to the total of the ring is examined, and its connection with related rings is investigated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.105
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it