Electrical Characterization of MOS Structures with Deposited Oxides Annealed in N<sub>2</sub>O or NO
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this work, the electrical characteristics and the reliability of 80nm thick deposited oxides annealed in NO and N2O on the 4H-SiC Si-face for gate oxide application in MOS devices is analyzed by C-V, I-V measurements and by constant current stress. Compared to thermally grown oxides, the deposited oxides annealed in N2O or NO showed improved electrical properties. Dit-values lower than 1011cm-2eV-1 have been achieved for the NO sample. The intrinsic QBD-values of deposited and annealed oxides are one order of magnitudes higher than the highest values reported for thermally grown oxides. Also MOSFETS were fabricated with a channel mobility of 20.05 cm2/Vs for the NO annealed deposited oxide. Furthermore annealing in NO is preferred to annealing in N2O regarding µFE- and QBD-values.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".