MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

XPS studies of Ni deposition on polymethyl methacrylate and poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile)

2000· article· en· W2094583397 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePolymers for Advanced Technologies · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicElectron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcrylonitrileX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyMaterials scienceStyreneMoietyEvaporationPolymerDeposition (geology)MethacrylatePolymer chemistryAcrylonitrile butadiene styreneNitrileChemical engineeringPolymerizationComposite materialOrganic chemistryCopolymerChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thin Ni layers were deposited onto clean polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) and poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile) (SAN) surfaces by a high vacuum thermal evaporation process. The resulting interfaces were studied by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. The Ni deposition on PMMA changes the relative intensity of the C1s spectra associated with the OCO and CO carbon species, and modifies the shape of the O1s peak, while the Ni evaporation on SAN alters the C1s band intensity assigned to the CN moiety and gives a second N1s band at low binding energies. These observations suggest the formation of new chemical species at the interface between Ni and the PMMA ester group, and between Ni and the SAN nitrile group, which are the most reactive sites on these two polymers. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.219
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it