MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2094594373 · doi:10.1111/1463-1652.00109

Beyond Nature, Shy of Grace

2003· article· en· W2094594373 on OpenAlexaff
Douglas Farrow

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Systematic Theology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSchismArgument (complex analysis)PhilosophyHuman sexualityTheologyEpistemologyReligious studiesSociologyLawGender studiesPolitical sciencePoliticsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: Eugene Rogers's Sexuality and the Christian Body offers a theological argument in favour of the churches’ acceptance of same‐sex marriage. There are four strands to this: an attempt to align homosexuals with groups of people whose status as naturally morally deficient (gentiles, slaves, women) is challenged within scripture; a deployment of the ethical strategies of Thomas Aquinas and Karl Barth to reach different conclusions to those they themselves reached; a theology of marriage that contains room for homosexual marriage; and a suggestion that at the least his arguments should be sufficient to demonstrate that this is not an issue that demands schism. This article argues that on each of these four points his arguments are deficient.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.894
Threshold uncertainty score0.338

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Systematic TheologySame topicAmerican Constitutional Law and PoliticsFrench-language works237,207