Study of Recovery and Recrystallisation in a Folded Al Alloy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Changes in the microstructure and crystallographic orientations during in-situ heating of folded Al 0.1%Mg have been followed by SEM and EBSD. The folding process results in both strain and texture gradients across the folded region which in turn can influence the recovery and recrystallisation processes as well as crystallographic texture. This work is an extension of ex-situ heating experiments on folded nickel 200, titanium and ferritic steel [1,2]. The present findings illustrates that during isothermal in-situ heating at 295oC nucleation and growth starts close to the surface where the deformation is highest, new grains form and grow in a region about quarter depth of the sheet thickness. After this grain growth occurs resulting in large grains that meet up at the centre line. These results are consistent with those found in ex-situ heated Ni200 alloy [2], where fine grains were found in the compressed and tensile regions with large grains in the middle of the sheet.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".