Regional Intermodal Freight Transport Flows and Projections
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study examined intermodal transport in the Province of New Brunswick in Canada’s Maritime Provinces. In 1998, the Policy Branch of the New Brunswick Department of Transportation commissioned the University of New Brunswick’s Transportation Group to conduct a study of intermodal freight transport in New Brunswick. The objective was to evaluate intermodal movements and provide the first provincial database on intermodal traffic, consisting of (a) traffic flowing through the province without an intermediate stop, (b) movements entirely within the province, and (c) movements with either a destination or an origin in the province. Data were collected from rail, truck, air, and marine centers. Transborder (between the United States and Canada) traffic was monitored, and a survey was conducted of shippers using either intermodal transport or potential users of the service. Issues that carriers and shippers had with existing intermodal services were solicited and evaluated. Growth trends for intermodal transport in the study area were developed using a most likely scenario. In developing the growth trends, the potential effects of recent and current events on growth were evaluated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".