Exact Frequency Analysis of a Rotating Cantilever Beam With Tip Mass Subjected to Torsional-Bending Vibrations
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An exact frequency analysis of a rotating beam with an attached tip mass is addressed in this paper while the beam undergoes coupled torsional-bending vibrations. The governing coupled equations of motion and the corresponding boundary condition are derived in detail using the extended Hamilton principle. It has been shown that the source of coupling in the equations of motion is the rotation and that the equations are linked through the angular velocity of the base. Since the beam-tip-mass system at hand serves as the building block of many vibrating gyroscopic systems, which require high precision, a closed-form frequency equation of the system should be derived to determine its natural frequencies. The frequency analysis is the basis of the time domain analysis, and hence, the exact frequency derivation would lead to accurate time domain results, too. Control strategies of the aforementioned gyroscopic systems are mostly based on their resonant condition, and hence, acquiring knowledge about their exact natural frequencies could lead to a better control of the system. The parameter sensitivity analysis has been carried out to determine the effects of various system parameters on the natural frequencies. It has been shown that even the undamped systems undergoing base rotation will have complex eigenvalues, which demonstrate a damping-type behavior.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it