MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2094626894 · doi:10.1021/jp0373088

Atmospheric Chemistry of Fluorinated Alcohols:  Reaction with Cl Atoms and OH Radicals and Atmospheric Lifetimes

2004· article· en· W2094626894 on OpenAlexaff
M. D. Hurley, Timothy J. Wallington, Mads P. Sulbæk Andersen, David Ellis, Jonathan W. Martin, Scott A. Mabury

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry A · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadicalChemistryReactivity (psychology)DiluentChlorine atomChlorineTorrMoleculeAtmospheric chemistryMedicinal chemistryAldehydeKineticsChemical kineticsPhotochemistryOrganic chemistryOzoneCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Relative rate techniques were used to study the kinetics of the reactions of Cl atoms and OH radicals with a series of fluorinated alcohols, F(CF 2 ) n CH 2 OH ( n = 1−4), in 700 Torr of N 2 or air diluent at 296 ± 2 K. The length of the F(CF 2 ) n group had no discernible impact on the reactivity of the molecule. For n = 1−4, k (Cl + F(CF 2 ) n CH 2 OH) = (6.48 ± 0.53) × 10 -13 and k (OH + F(CF 2 ) n CH 2 OH) = (1.02 ± 0.10) × 10 -13 cm 3 molecule -1 s -1 . Product studies of the chlorine initiated oxidation of F(CF 2 ) n CH 2 OH ( n = 1−4) in the absence of NO show the sole primary product to be the corresponding aldehyde, F(CF 2 ) n C(O)H. Consideration of the likely rates of other possible atmospheric loss mechanisms leads to the conclusion that the atmospheric lifetime of F(CF 2 ) n CH 2 OH ( n ≥ 1) is determined by reaction with OH radicals and is approximately 164 days.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.556

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations86
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry ASame topicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosolsFrench-language works237,207