MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2094662120 · doi:10.1177/0731684409103143

Punching Shear of Two-way Slabs Retrofitted with Prestressed or Non-prestressed CFRP Sheets

2009· article· en· W2094662120 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceSlabStructural engineeringReinforcementCrackingShear (geology)PunchingFinite element methodComposite materialFailure mode and effects analysisPrestressed concreteShear stressEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study presents punching shear behavior of two-way slabs strengthened with prestressed or non-prestressed carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) sheets. Four two-way slabs (2360 × 2360 × 150 mm 3 ) with a steel reinforcement ratio of 1.44% are tested under concentric load. All slabs exhibit a punching shear failure mode. The strengthened slabs show an increase of up to approximately 20% in load-carrying capacity and an increase of up to 25% in cracking load with respect to the unstrengthened control slab. A detailed stress analysis in reinforcement is conducted along the loading span of the slabs, including the critical shear perimeter surrounding the column stub. The effective strain zone near the slab—column connection, where a sudden increase of strains in the reinforcement is observed, is also studied. The development of shear stresses in the vicinity of the slab—column connection is examined. A non-linear 3D finite element analysis is conducted and analytical predictive models for the punching shear failure are evaluated as well.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.940

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it