MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2094682622 · doi:10.14740/jcs263w

Surgical Management of Simple Liver Cysts: A 10-Year Single-Center Experience

2015· article· en· W2094682622 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Current Surgery · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSurgeryCystPleural effusionHistopathologyRetrospective cohort studySingle CenterLaparoscopy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Due to the limited data comparing treatment outcomes of simple liver cysts (SLCs), there is, at present, no consensus on the optimum surgical treatment method for symptomatic SLCs. The objective of this paper was to review the outcomes for surgically managed SLCs carried out at our institution. Methods: A database search was performed to identify all patients who, between January 2003 and December 2012, underwent surgical intervention with a preoperative diagnosis of symptomatic SLCs at our institution. Retrospective analysis of patient demographics, symptoms, cyst characteristics including number, size, location and imaging features, operative management, postoperative morbidity and mortality, length of hospital stay, final histopathological diagnosis and long-term outcomes were performed. Results: Between January 2003 and December 2012, 28 patients underwent surgical intervention for symptomatic SLCs at our institution. Twenty-four were female (85.7%) and four were male (14.3%), with a mean age of 58 years. Laparoscopic fenestration was performed in 11 patients (39.3%), open fenestration in four (14.3%), laparoscopic resection in six (21.4%) and open resection in seven (25%). The mean cyst diameter was 8.97 ± 5.11 cm. Operative mortality was 3.6% (n = 1). Complications developed in two patients (7.2%), including pleural effusion (n = 1) and perihepatic abscess (n = 1). The final histopathology demonstrated an SLC in 23 patients (82.1%), cystadenoma in four (14.3%) and cystadenocarcinoma in one patient (3.6%). Length of hospital stay was 2.38 ± 2.06 days for the laparoscopic group and 7 ± 3.12 days for the open surgery group. Two patients (7.14%) experienced asymptomatic recurrence of cyst. The mean length of follow-up was 25.1 months (range 12 - 104.1) and the overall survival rate at 1 year was 96.4%. Conclusion: Laparoscopic fenestration is a safe and effective treatment for symptomatic SLCs. Open fenestration should be considered for large cysts, cysts presenting difficult laparoscopic access, and cysts with atypical features. Atypical features should prompt intraoperative frozen section and, if necessary, liver resection. J Curr Surg. 2015;5(1):129-132 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jcs263w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.329
Threshold uncertainty score0.374

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it