A Mössbauer effect study of single crystals of the non-superconducting parent compound Fe<sub>1.09</sub>Te and the superconductor FeSe<sub>0.4</sub>Te<sub>0.6</sub>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The results of a (57)Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy study between 2.0 and 297 K of the parent compound Fe1.09Te and the superconductor FeSe0.4Te0.6 are reported. It is shown that in both compounds the magnitude of the quadrupole splitting increases with decreasing temperature and is well described by a T(3/2) power-law relation. The presence of incommensurate spin-density-wave antiferromagnetism in Fe1.09Te is demonstrated, with the Néel temperature T(N) = 71.1(6) K. A theoretical prediction (Zhang et al 2009 Phys. Rev. B 79 012506) of the Fe magnetic moment at the 2c sites being significantly larger than that at the 2a sites in the parent compound is confirmed experimentally by showing that these moments at 4.4 K are, respectively, 3.20(4) and 1.78(3) μ(B). The absence of magnetic order in FeSe0.4Te0.6 down to 2.0 K is confirmed. The Debye temperatures of Fe1.09Te and FeSe0.4Te0.6 are found to be 290(1) and 233(1) K, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".