Dons cachés, normes matrimoniales et règles d’héritage dans les échanges au sein des ménages à Lubumbashi
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Régulièrement, nous entendons que les Africains sont solidaires. Ce discours encensant cache bien d’autres formes d’échanges entre les parents, notamment les aides clandestines envers les familles d’origine des conjoints. Le plus souvent, on se contente des réalités présentées sur la sphère publique comme le transfert aux parents des biens matériels et de l’argent pour essentialiser la solidarité dite africaine. Un double jeu social entre les solidarités officielles et ostentatoires (les hébergements) et les solidarités officieuses et cachées (aides clandestines) détermine les recompositions familiales. En même temps, les aides clandestines soulèvent la question des limites entre l’immoralité et la moralité dans l’exercice des solidarités. Cet article poursuit deux objectifs : décrire les coulisses des pratiques de la solidarité dans les ménages et établir une relation entre les aides clandestines et les normes matrimoniales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".