Late Ordovician brachiopod communities of southeast China
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Upper Ordovician (mid-Ashgill) Xiazhen and Changwu formations in the Zhejiang-Jiangxi border region of southeastern China contain an abundant and diverse suite of brachiopods. A cluster analysis of 59 key samples from 180 collections (over 23 000 specimens) allowed delineation of eight distinct brachiopod communities, herein named the Ectenoglossa minor Community, the Eospirifer praecursor Community, the Ovalospira dichotoma Community, the Antizygospira liquanensis Sowerbyella sinensis Community, the Kassinella shiyangensis Community, the Altaethyrella zhejiangensis Community, the Tcherskidium jiangshanensis Community and the Foliomena folium Community. These communities occur predominantly in limey, clayey, to silty mudstone facies, similar to Ziegler's Early Silurian brachiopod communities in the Welsh Borderland. On the basis of lithological, faunal, and paleogeographical evidence, the eight communities are interpreted to have distributed along an onshoreoffshore gradient from BA1 to BA6 settings on the northeastern margin of the Zhe-Gan Platform. In a broad paleo-embayment and mixed carbonatesiliciclastic shelf setting, the distribution of the eight brachiopod communities appears to have been controlled primarily by water depth because a given brachiopod community can be found in different lithofacies. Substrate types, however, must have played an important role, as some of the communities show preferred lithofacies. This study shows that the ecological zonation and community organization of the Late Ordovician pre-extinction brachiopods were similar to those of Early Silurian post-extinction brachiopods, although pronounced brachiopod provincialism during the Ashgill makes it difficult to directly correlate these communities with coeval brachiopod communities reported from other paleo-plates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".