MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2094754107 · doi:10.2741/szyf

The role of DNA methyltransferase 1 in growth control

2001· review· en· W2094754107 on OpenAlexafffund
Moshe Szyf

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in bioscience · 2001
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsDNMT1DNA methylationDNA methyltransferaseBiologyMethyltransferaseCell cycleDNA replicationDNACell biologyGeneticsMethylationCellGene expressionGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vertebrate DNA contains in addition to the four bases comprising the genetic information a modified base, 5-methyl cytosine that plays an important role in the epigenome. The methylated bases form a pattern of methylation that is cell specific and is faithfully inherited during cell division. The enzyme DNA methyltransferase 1 DNMT1 is responsible for copying the DNA methylation pattern but other de novo methyltransferase as well as demethylases might also be involved. Multiple mechanisms are in place to ensure the coordinate inheritance of the DNA methylation pattern with DNA replication. There is a bilateral relationship between the cell cycle and DNMT1. The expression of DNMT1 is tightly regulated with the cell cycle while the expression of DNMT1 can affect the cell cycle. DNMT1 protein might regulate cell cycle events by mechanisms that are independent of its DNA methylation activity through its multiple protein-protein interactions. The unique position of DNMT1 in the cell cycle is consistent with the hypothesis that it plays an important role in cancer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations51
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in bioscienceSame topicEpigenetics and DNA MethylationFrench-language works237,207