MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2094754107 · doi:10.2741/szyf

The role of DNA methyltransferase 1 in growth control

2001· review· en· W2094754107 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in bioscience · 2001
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsDNMT1DNA methylationDNA methyltransferaseBiologyMethyltransferaseCell cycleDNA replicationDNACell biologyGeneticsMethylationCellGene expressionGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vertebrate DNA contains in addition to the four bases comprising the genetic information a modified base, 5-methyl cytosine that plays an important role in the epigenome. The methylated bases form a pattern of methylation that is cell specific and is faithfully inherited during cell division. The enzyme DNA methyltransferase 1 DNMT1 is responsible for copying the DNA methylation pattern but other de novo methyltransferase as well as demethylases might also be involved. Multiple mechanisms are in place to ensure the coordinate inheritance of the DNA methylation pattern with DNA replication. There is a bilateral relationship between the cell cycle and DNMT1. The expression of DNMT1 is tightly regulated with the cell cycle while the expression of DNMT1 can affect the cell cycle. DNMT1 protein might regulate cell cycle events by mechanisms that are independent of its DNA methylation activity through its multiple protein-protein interactions. The unique position of DNMT1 in the cell cycle is consistent with the hypothesis that it plays an important role in cancer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.992
Threshold uncertainty score0.589

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it