MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2094781356 · doi:10.1159/000170173

Clinical Aspects of Cardiomyopathy in Dialysis Patients

2008· article· en· W2094781356 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood Purification · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDialysis and Renal Disease Management
Canadian institutionsSt. John’s Health Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLeft ventricular hypertrophyHeart failureInternal medicineCardiologyAnemiaUremiaDialysisHypoalbuminemiaDiabetes mellitusKidney diseaseCardiomyopathyBlood pressureEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The burden of cardiac disease in dialysis patients is high. Congestive heart failure, ischemic heart disease, left ventricular hypertrophy, and systolic dysfunction occur frequently and are associated with an adverse prognosis. In addition, during dialysis therapy anemia, hypoalbuminemia, low blood pressure, and lower serum creatinine levels are adverse predictors of mortality. Risk factors for systolic dysfunction include older age, ischemic heart disease, hyperparathyroidism, and smoking. Risk factors for left ventricular hypertrophy include older age, hypertension, anemia, and diabetes mellitus. Interventions with potential for improving cardiomyopathy include normalization of hematocrit with erythropoietin, improved uremia therapy, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Trials to determine the most appropriate interventions to reduce the impact of cardiac disease in chronic uremia are urgently required.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.232

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it