MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2094782639 · doi:10.4304/jcm.6.3.215-224

A Short-Time Burst degradation Classifier for Real-Time Traffic with Application in MPLS Ingress Nodes

2011· article· en· W2094782639 on OpenAlexaff
Masoomeh Torabzadeh, Wessam Ajib

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Communications · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Traffic and Congestion Control
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkBurstinessQuality of serviceReal-time computingScheduling (production processes)Classifier (UML)Queueing theoryPollingNetwork packetArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose a novel classifier technique, named short-time burst degradation classifier (SBDC), to improve the short-term delay and the packet jitter for real-time traffic. In the classifier, we manage the traffic to improve the sort-term QoS provisioning in a flexible manner, since traditional mechanisms such as leaky bucket can not have such kind of flexibility. Even though, the proposed scheme is general and can be used in different points of the network, we propose to use it in MPLS ingress nodes. To evaluate the performance of the classifier we propose an efficient scheduler, called short-term quality-of-service class based queuing (SQ-CBQ), to be combined with our classifier. The scheduler uses a new scheduling algorithm named polling deficit round robin (PDRR). Also, after using the combination of the classifier and the scheduler in an MPLS ingress node the impact of short-time scale burstiness of the traffic will be decreased. The performance analysis shows that high quality of service provisioning for the real-time traffic will be achieved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of CommunicationsSame topicNetwork Traffic and Congestion ControlFrench-language works237,207