Derailed Dementia: Alzheimer's Disease versus Posterior Cortical Atrophy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To the Editor: Benson's syndrome, or posterior cortical atrophy (PCA), is a progressive dementia that is distinguished by early and prominent visuoperceptual and visuospatial symptoms. Comorbidities such as posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) may obscure its recognition, diagnosis, and treatment. A 71-year-old man with Benson's syndrome presented to the geriatric clinic for evaluation and management of behavioral disturbances. He was receiving quetiapine 75 mg twice daily and armodafinil 125 mg/d. His neurologist had “nothing further to offer.” He had failed prior donepezil and memantine trials. Past medical history included hip replacement and genital herpes, with a family history of a mother with Alzheimer's disease (AD). His wife reported alexia, such as losing his place on the page while reading, with preserved accurate reading of small print but not large print, and misjudgment of distances when driving, resulting in minor car accidents. His wife described unusual activities such as placing watermelon rather than tomatoes on his hamburger, putting clothing on backward, donning two pairs of pants, and applying toothpaste to the cap rather than the toothbrush. He was depressed and anxious because of numerous prior optometry consultations during which no diagnosis was found for his visual abnormalities. Prior magnetic resonance imaging showed cortical volume loss in bilateral parietal lobes. Records documented dementia diagnosed at age 65. His Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score was 5 out of 30 at the clinic appointment, which included a clock drawing showing an unusual constructional apraxia (Figure 1); his dementia laboratory examination was normal. He was verbally appropriate and described working with railroad cranes and four near-death experiences due to train accidents and derailment. He reported nightmares with flashbacks, night sweats, and a history of self-medicating with alcohol. Sertraline was initiated for undiagnosed PTSD and mood and behavior disturbances, with plans to taper off quetiapine because of orthostatic hypotension (supine blood pressure 130/84 mmHg; standing blood pressure 114/79 mmHg) and armodafinil. Referrals to a low vision clinic and caregiver support were made. Five weeks later, his wife reported that his behavioral symptoms improved significantly, stating, “I have my husband back now.” Dr. Frank Benson first described Benson's syndrome, or PCA, in a five-person case series in 1988.1 Individuals present with early visual and visuospatial complaints in the absence of significant primary ocular disease2 and may present as functionally blind.3 Distinct from AD, memory, language, insight, and judgment are relatively preserved until late in the disease course.1 Age of onset is typically 50 to 65, earlier than with typical AD. The prevalence and incidence of PCA are unknown, but it is considered an uncommon disease.4 On imaging, there is atrophy of posterior brain regions,5 with more than 80% of individuals with PCA found to have AD pathology as the cause of dementia at autopsy.2, 4 No consensus criteria exist at present,2 and there is disagreement as to whether PCA is linked to AD as a visual variant or subgroup of AD or perhaps a distinct nosological entity.6 A recent multidisciplinary group of PCA research clinicians worked to develop a consensus on diagnostic criteria.4 Core features included prominent visual impairment without significant impairment of vision itself, relative preservation of memory and insight, complex visual disorders such as Balint syndrome (consisting of ocular dysmetria (misreaching), sticky fixation (cannot shift gaze), and simultanagnosia (inability to perceive more than a single object at a time), Gerstmann syndrome (finger agnosia, left–right disorientation, acalculia, agraphia), visual field defects, visual agnosia, and environmental disorientation. Insidious onset and gradual progression with absence of stroke or tumor are other core features. There are also reports of strange manifestations of objects or letters suddenly moving, disappearing, or popping up when looking at them and reading small letters more easily than big ones.7 There are no PCA management guidelines, and only a few articles have mentioned using cholinesterase inhibitors.3, 7 In this man's case, worsening cognition may have triggered decompensation of his undiagnosed PTSD, and treatment with an antidepressant was instituted.8 Peer support groups may be beneficial in initial and intermediate stages. Resources for blind and partially sighted people can be recommended.9 Occupational and physical therapy are other resources, with a 10-week course of cognitive rehabilitation leading to some improvement in everyday functioning.10 PCA is an uncommon progressive dementia with an atypical cluster of symptoms. Mental health comorbidities may obscure diagnosis. The MoCA and other screening tests are heavily weighted using visual content. It is likely that clinicians will see more cases with the “graying” of the population. Conflict of Interest: The editor in chief has reviewed the conflict of interest checklist provided by the authors and has determined that the authors have no financial or any other kind of personal conflicts with this paper. Author Contributions: All authors made substantial contribution to the information submitted for publication and read and approved the final manuscript. Sponsor's Role: None.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.018 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.014 | 0.012 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".