MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2094812471 · doi:10.1109/tcsi.2006.883855

Fast Bit Parallel-Shifted Polynomial Basis Multipliers in <formula formulatype="inline"><tex>$GF(2^{n})$</tex></formula>

2006· article· en· W2094812471 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Fundamental Theory and Applications · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptography and Residue Arithmetic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmpereMathematicsPolynomialPhysicsMathematical analysisQuantum mechanicsVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new nonpipelined bit-parallel-shifted polynomial basis multiplier for GF(2n) is presented. For some irreducible trinomials, the space complexity of the multiplier matches the best results available in the literature, and its gate delay is equal to T A+lceillog2nrceilTX, where TA and TX are the delay of one two-input and and xor gates, respectively. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that the gate delay bound TA+lceillog2nrceilTX is reached. For some irreducible pentanomials, its gate delay is equal to TA +(1+lceillog2nrceil)TX. NIST has recommended five binary fields for the elliptic curve digital signature algorithm applications: GF(2163), GF(2233), GF(2 283), GF(2409), and GF(2571), but no irreducible trinomials exist for three degrees, viz., 163, 283 and 571. For the three corresponding binary fields, we show that the gate delay of the proposed multiplier is TA+(1+lceillog2nrceil)TX. This result outperforms the previously known results

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.949
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it