Early menopausal hormone use influences brain regions used for visual working memory
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Brief Objective: The cognitive benefit of postmenopausal hormone use is controversial; however, timing of treatment close to menopause may increase the likelihood of preserving cognitive function. We examined the effects of early-initiation hormone use on visual working memory, hypothesizing that long-term hormone use is associated with greater brain activation during visual working memory. Methods: This was a cross-sectional comparison of long-term early hormone users-current (n = 13) and past (n = 24; 2.1 ± 1.0 years off hormones)-with never users (n = 18), using a visual memory task and functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We evaluated 55 women older than 60 years at the University of Michigan's General Clinical Research Center. Hormone users had completed at least 10 continuous years of conjugated equine estrogens with or without medroxyprogesterone acetate, begun within 2 years of menopause. Women were excluded for illness, medication, intermittent estrogen use, phytoestrogen use, recent smoking, and MRI contraindications. The primary outcome was functional MRI-detected brain activity during the visual memory task. Results: Compared with never users, both groups of hormone users had increased activation in the frontal and parietal cortices, insula, hippocampus, and cingulate; combined hormone users also had increased activation in the putamen and raphe (corrected P < 0.05 or uncorrected P < 0.001 with a priori hypothesis). Across the entire sample, the medial temporal cortex (P < 0.0001 right; P < 0.018 left) and right hippocampus (P < 0.0001) positively correlated with task performance. Conclusions: Hormone use was associated with increased brain activation during the visual memory task, in regions used for visual working memory. A positive correlation between activation and task performance suggests that early-initiation, long-term postmenopausal hormone use may benefit visual working memory. Long-term postmenopausal hormone use, begun close to the time of menopause, is associated with increased activation of brain regions used for visual working memory while performing a visual memory task. A positive correlation between activation in these regions and performance on the visual task suggests a potential benefit of early-initiation hormone use on visual working memory processes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".