MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Morbidity After Flap Reconstruction of Hypopharyngeal Defects

2006· article· en· W2094830991 on OpenAlexaff
Jonathan R. Clark, Ralph Gilbert, Jonathan Irish, Dale H. Brown, Peter C. Neligan, Patrick Gullane

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Laryngoscope · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSurgeryHypopharyngeal cancerUnivariate analysisRetrospective cohort studyFistulaComplicationRadiation therapyMultivariate analysisInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: Laryngopharyngeal reconstruction continues to challenge in terms of operative morbidity and optimal functional results. The primary aim of this study is to determine whether complications can be predicted on the basis of reconstruction in patients undergoing pharyngectomy for tumors involving the hypopharynx. In addition, we detail a reconstructive algorithm for management of partial and total laryngopharyngectomy defects. METHOD: A retrospective review was performed of 153 patients undergoing flap reconstruction for 85 partial and 68 circumferential pharyngectomies at a single institution over a 10-year period. There were 118 males and 35 females, the median age was 62 years, and mean follow up was 3.1 years. Pharyngectomy was performed for recurrence after radiotherapy in 80 patients and as primary surgery in 73. Free flap reconstruction was used in 42%, with 30 jejunal, 15 radial forearm, 11 anterolateral thigh, five rectus abdominis, and three gastro-omental flaps. Gastric transposition and pectoralis major pedicle flap was used in 14% and 44% of patients, respectively. Morbidity was analyzed according to extent of defect, regional versus free flap, enteric versus fasciocutaneous free flap reconstruction, and the effect of laparotomy. RESULTS: The total operative morbidity and mortality rate was 71% and 3%, respectively. The most common complications were hypocalcemia in 45%, pharyngocutaneous fistula in 33%, and wound complications in 25%. The late complication and stricture rate was 26% and 15%, respectively. On univariate analysis, circumferential defects were associated with increased total (P=.046) and flap-related morbidity (P=.037), hypocalcemia (P<.001), late complications (P=.003), and stricture (P=.009). Gastric transposition had increased total (P=.007), flap-related (P=.035), late complications (P=.034), and hypocalcemia (P=.001). Pharyngocutaneous fistula was increased in patients undergoing salvage pharyngectomy for radiation failure (P=.048) compared with primary surgery. On multivariate analysis, gastric transposition independently predicted for wound complications (P=.014) and fistula (P=.012). Circumferential defects predicted for flap-related morbidity (P=.030), hypocalcemia (P=.017), and late complications (P=.042). Tracheoesophageal speech was the method of voice restoration in 44% of patients. Oral diet was achieved in 93% of patients; however, 16% required gastrostomy tube feeds for either total or supplemental nutrition. CONCLUSION: The operative morbidity associated with pharyngeal reconstruction is substantial in terms of early and late complications. We were able to predict morbidity by defect extent and reconstruction type and initial treatment modality. Swallowing function is acceptable; however, less than half of the patients undergoing pharyngectomy had tracheoesophageal puncture voice restoration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations123
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe LaryngoscopeSame topicReconstructive Surgery and Microvascular TechniquesFrench-language works237,207