Anomalous V-shape Palmaris Longus Tendon: Two Cases
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We describe an incidental rare finding of V-shape tendon of Palmaris Longus (PL) in two cases. Examination of 253 subjects/506 hands for detection of PL Tendon by the standard clinical tests was undergone. The sample mean age was 21 years and M/F ratio was 1:3.The identification of V-shape bifid tendon was revealed only by Schaeffer’s test whiles both Thompson’s and Mishra’s tests failed to demonstrate the anomaly. These two cases with anomalous tendon did not provoke any symptom. The importance of this finding being a potential source of V-shape support that can be used as tendon transfer to extensor tendons, in restoration procedure of radial palsy, and as free transplant in reanimation of oral and lid angles in facial palsy or any where when a V-shape support is required. Therefore surgeon awareness of this anomalous tendon and pre-operative identification is warranted. doi:10.4021/jmc114e
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".