Bibliographic record
Abstract
This is the 14th volume in the series on ‘Genetics, Genomics and Breeding of Crop Plants’, each book covering one or a group of species, so far including many major crops but not the cereals. The three areas discussed in the volumes are some of the most rapidly changing areas of biology today. For each crop, genetics and genomics sees tens if not hundreds of relevant publications every year, while breeding aims and approaches change rapidly. These challenges give both the strengths and weaknesses to this volume. A synthesis of the state-of-the art with respect to oilseed brassicas is certainly needed – but it was substantially out-of-date even before publication. The brassica volume consists of 16 chapters by well-known researchers, ranging from a description of the Brassica genus, through genetic maps, markers and comparative genomics, to mutagenesis and metabolomics. Three chapters discuss breeding objectives. Overall, there is much of interest in the volume. The forward-looking statements in many chapters, and three complete chapters largely about prospects, make some important and thoughtful points. There are also a number of gaps in coverage, where I would have hoped a volume like this would be my first source of reference. For breeding, I was disappointed not to see a strong chapter on hybrid breeding, since within the last decade hybrid Brassica napus has moved from a few percent of the market to representing more than 50 %, in Canada and the UK at least. This change is alluded to in a couple of chapters, but there is no detailed consideration of what this means for the future of the crop and selection approaches. It is important for books, at least for me, to have some degree of timeless information, which I can refer back to at almost any point in the future. There are some highspots here such as a nine-page table of the 58(!) Brassica linkage maps published since 2006, a list of the 15 large-insert BAC libraries available, and three pages of insect pests. But, with a coverage of genetics and breeding, I would have also liked to see more such tables, for example with oil contents and oil compositions of the different brassicas, more information about morphological variation such as seed characters, and data about germplasm collections and what is represented in them (although taxonomy is discussed in some chapters). Somewhat surprisingly, for a book published in September 2011, the genome sequencing initiatives chapter states, ‘We expect the A, C and B genome sequences to become publicaly available of the next few years’: the A genome B. rapa sequence was published online in August 2011, with the chapter authors both being co-authors of the journal paper (Wang et al., 2011). Surely this was in time, and significant enough, to be discussed, but it gives the book immediate obselesence, with no references in this chapter later than the three general papers referrred to from 2009 (before the impact of next-generation sequencing was felt, mentioned as a prospect in other chapters). The chapter itself is largely historical, describing the history of brassica whole-genome sequencing and genetics (noting, for example, that, ‘Genome sequence information will also revolutionise genetic and physical mapping’, without elaborating on what this means and has revealed in Brassica). Is geographical spread of authorship relevant? I think so in a book on genetics and breeding of major crops where location is so important: but we have no perspective of breeding from Asia, with only one chapter on mutagenesis and mutation breeding from China, and no authors from India, or Korea where molecular and other breeding programmes are addressing major challenges. Unfortunately less surprisingly, Africa also receives little mention, despite the huge need there for plant oils, and the use of Abyssynian mustard (the BC genome tetraploid B. carinata). The book will undoubtedly be useful to many specialists in Brassica. However, the very weak index, rather superficial and generalized statements about prospects rather than the details for many techniques, and a few points where one feels the book is long out of date (although in fact only by one or two years), mean its appeal is somewhat limited.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".