MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2094839774 · doi:10.1021/ja077601b

Low Energy Electron Induced DNA Damage: Effects of Terminal Phosphate and Base Moieties on the Distribution of Damage

2008· article· en· W2094839774 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicElectron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhosphodiester bondChemistryCleavage (geology)PhosphateDNA damageGlycosidic bondDNABond cleavageStereochemistryBiochemistryCatalysisRNAEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Low energy electrons (LEE) induce DNA damage by dissociative electron attachment, which involves base release (N-glycosidic bond (N-C) cleavage) and the formation of strand breaks (phosphodiester-sugar bond (C-O) cleavage). The effect of terminal phosphate and base moieties was assessed by exposing DNA model compounds to LEE in the condensed phase followed by HPLC-UV analysis of products remaining on the surface. First, we report that the presence of terminal phosphate groups in monomers (pT, Tp, pTp) and dimers (pTpT, TpTp, pTpTp) increases overall damage by 2-3-fold while it decreases N-C and C-O bond cleavage by 2-10-fold. This suggests that the capture of LEE directly by the terminal phosphate does not contribute to N-C and C-O bond cleavage. Second, we report that terminal bases appear to shield the internal base from damage, resulting in a bias of damage toward the termini. In summary, the presence of terminal phosphate base moieties greatly affects the distribution of LEE induced damage in DNA model compounds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.326

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it