Genome‐wide linkage analysis of blood pressure in Mexican Americans
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The genetic mechanisms that control variation in blood pressure level are largely unknown. One of the first steps in understanding those mechanisms is the localization of the genes that have a significant effect on blood pressure. We performed genome scans of systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) on a population-based sample of families in the San Antonio Family Heart Study. A likelihood-based Mendelian model incorporating genotype-specific effects of sex, age, age(2), BMI, and blood pressure (SBP or DBP, as appropriate) as covariates was used to perform two-point lodscore (Z) linkage on 399 polymorphic markers. Results showed that the genotype-specific covariate effects were highly significant for both SBP and DBP. Linkage results showed that a quantitative trait locus (QTL) influencing DBP was significantly linked to D2S1790 (Z = 3.92, theta = 0.00) and showed suggestive linkage to D8S373 (Z = 1.92, theta = 0.00). A QTL influencing SBP showed suggestive linkage to D21S1440 (Z = 2.82, theta = 0.00) and D18S844 (Z = 2.09, theta = 0.11). Without the genotype-specific effects in the model, the linkage to D2S1790 was not even suggestive (Z = 1.33, theta = 0.09); thus genotype-specific modeling was crucial in detecting this linkage. A comparison with linkage studies based in other populations showed that the significant linkage to D2S1790 has been replicated at the same marker in the Quebec Family Study. The replicated significant linkage at D2S1790 may begin to establish the locations of the genes that significantly affect blood pressure across several human ethnic groups.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".