AN IMAGE-GUIDED MAGNETIC RESONANCE-COMPATIBLE SURGICAL ROBOT
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The past decade has witnessed the increasing application of robotics in surgery, yet there is no existing system that combines stereotaxy and microsurgery in an imaging environment. To fulfill this niche, we have designed and manufactured an image-guided robotic system that is compatible with magnetic resonance imaging. METHODS: The system conveys the sight, touch, and sound of surgery to an operator seated at a remote workstation. Motion scaling, tremor filtering, and precision robotics allow surgeons to rapidly attain technical proficiency while working at a spatial resolution of 50 to 100 microm instead of a few millimeters. This system has the potential to shift surgery from the organ toward the cellular level. RESULTS: By integrating the robot with images obtained during the procedure, the effects of surgery on both the lesion and brain are immediately revealed. CONCLUSION: We are providing technology to advance and transform surgery with the potential to improve patient outcome.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it