Water-Dispersible Tetrablock Copolymer Synthesis, Aggregation, Nanotube Preparation, and Impregnation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A tetrablock copolymer polyisoprene- block -poly( tert -butyl acrylate)- block -poly[(2-cinnamoyloxyethyl methacrylate)- ran -(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate)]- block -poly(solketal methacrylate), or PI- b -P t BA- b -P(CEMA- r -HEMA)- b -PSMA, was synthesized and characterized. After PSMA hydrolysis to poly(glyceryl methacrylate), or PGMA, the tetrablock formed cylindrical aggregates in water with a PGMA corona and an insoluble part consisting of PI and P(CEMA- r -PHEMA) core−shell cylinders that sandwich a P t BA thin layer. Water-dispersible nanotubes were obtained after the cross-linking of the P(CEMA- r -HEMA) layer and cleavage of the PI cores with ozone. Both nanotubes containing some ozonized PI fragments and the cross-linked PI- b -P t BA- b -P(CEMA- r -HEMA)- b -PGMA cylindrical aggregates sorbed Pd 2+ from dimethylformamide as a result of the π-allyl complex formation between Pd 2+ and the PI double bonds. The sorbed Pd 2+ was reduced to Pd nanoparticles, and the particles were made to overlap by catalyzing further Pd deposition on them in an electroless Pd plating bath. These polymer/metal hybrid nanofibers with conductive cores may be useful as nanocables or as a catalyst for reagents that can permeate the P(CEMA- r -PHEMA) layer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it