Le pinson du Nord Fringilla montifringilla L.: un visiteur d'exception dans les forêts d'Ajoie durant l'hiver 2001–2002 | The brambling Fringilla montifringilla L.: a rare visitor in the forests of Ajoie in winter 2001/2002
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the winter of 2001/2002, over a period lasting 110 days, ten to twelve million bramblings (northern Eurasian finches)sought a place to sleep in the region of Villars-sur-Fontenais in Canton Jura, Switzerland. Suitable resting places in the proximity of access roads enabled a great number of ornithologists to carry out regular and numerous observations that were collected by the author in Jura's Natural Science Museum in Porrentruy. A lot of new information on the behaviour of the bramblings at their places of rest was collected, both during the day, on their return, and was also closely observed and described with regard to weather conditions and the change of season. Information was also collected on the ethology of predators. The special aspect of the article is the visit to the resting places after the departure of the bramblings. Much new knowledge was gained from this. Pseudombrophila stercofringilla,a newly discovered Ascomyzete, was actually found by its discoverer in situ. The effect was detected of uric acid,which turned the ground plants brown and destroyed fir needles from the previous year. It would be a worthwhile subject of scientific inquiry to study the effect of enrichment with fertiliser – manifest on trees and mushrooms. A regional study would make it possible to examine whether the scratching activity of the bramblings, allowing beechnuts to fall on fruitful ground, have a positive effect of regeneration of beech forests in the long term.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".